Sunday, February 12, 2006
Generative Methodology Glass Bead Games
n-articulated ontological framework
On using RDF to model web services
Link back to part of the “solution” to translations between
RDF / OWL and Models of Information -> [167]
Sub-theme
n-articulated
ontological framework
[168] [169] [170] [171] [172] [173] [174]
(part of the Protégé eforum discussion)
hi,
the discussion between Andrea and Paul on Owl/RDF/RDFS properties is really very informative... I would like to ask one more question regarding the relation among these three different types of properties...
In the Pizza Ontology, most of the properties are of the Owl type, but the "subClassOf" properties is of the RDFS type... why is this so? is it because there is no possibility of using "owl:subClassOf" property, or is there any advantage of using this rdfs type for "subClassOf" property even if there is a possibility of using "owl:subClassOf"?
If I want to get the full use of Owl advantages is there a need to also use RDF/RDFS properties in the ontology?
thanks
Raj.