The Taos
Discussion
Thursday, September 08, 2005
I say: “Kelly,
we all sit within our own illusions.”
He says “Paul,
it is not relevant.”
A shift in the discussion to
the bead thread:
Generative Methodology
thread à
ß
continue within the “Taos
Discussion” ß
a Fall 2005 unsigned Thunder
Bow
available in Giclee Extension . à [ @ ] ß .
This morning Kelly and I visited about the difference between various forms of the prosperity gospel, and knowledge of the structure-function relationships expressed by the “unseen”.
A man of knowledge of the structure-function relationships is one who is a master of prosperity, as well as letting go of a need for prosperity.
The paradoxes within this discussion are as they are.
Who is A Kelly Pruitt? Is it possible to know?
Who are any one of us? Is it possible to know?
Are there things worth doing?
Is it possible to know?
As we approach this discussion,
we agree that “thought cannot live in the present moment.”
And we agree that there is some “structure
to how the unseen assembles the present moment”.
I feel that structure-function relationships can be know and expressed as “categorical abstraction” and measured through co-occurrence relationships. This is beyond the current mechanistic science of the engineers, and beyond the polemics of computer science (including the mythology of ‘artificial intelligence”.)
The structure-function relationships are observed and through this observation an ability to see the unseen becomes available to a Master of one’s own Knowledge. The observation is one event and is about an experienced context. The accumulation of categorical awareness is by an individual who is following a Master’s Path. The path is unique for each individual.
The system for creation of ontological referential bases (orbs) is designed to mimic an aware human’s, or animal’s, learning from the invariances observable from a series of life experiences. In individual humans, this learning from observation’s made can lead to an ability to walk in a masterful way. In the computational system, orbs are created from measurements of co-occurrence of symbols, such as language units (words, phrases, etc). The co-occurrence is within the situation and so corresponds to an awareness of situation by a human. Because the computational system is not aware, and cannot by nature be aware (inspite the false claims of the artificial intelligence community), the orbs have only the categorical information about what is occurring (the invariance) and which of those things (atoms of events) which are occurring are co-occurring as part of the event being measured.
Measurement of occurrence of invariance, and co-occurrence of those things occurring; takes the place of observations of a Master of one’s own Knowledge.