< a comment on the fractal nature of memetic science>
There is a need to talk about the fractal nature of AIC
models, and the nature of terminology variation when there is a shift in
conversational context. The need is
critical so that what Bill is saying is not misunderstood because someone is
behaving poorly and fails to apply a deeper set of understandings that what is
explicitly said in Bill's note.
a tag is inserted at this point of "affordance"
http://www.bcngroup.org/beadgames/MST/two.htm
the notion of a bead game is to create a semantic artifact
that is LIKE the Orb graphs but which is more Peircean in this precise sense of
semantic affordance (something that leads to something else).
How this bead game comes into being is a question that Nathan and I are struggling with now, this week.
The hope is that the “syntagmatic” Orbs can be seen to
provide a precise measurement of co-occurrence and that the convolution of
syntagmatic Orbs into semantic Orbs can be figured out. We do not know specifically how to do this
at this time.