[51]                             home                             [53]

May 3, 2005

 

 

 

Anticipatory Web thread

 

 

 

On the discussion of data regularity à 

 On the Stephenson Cyber Attack Taxonomy  à

 

 

 

Interesting Exchange

 

A.

 

From the discussions yesterday, I am concerned that the BCNGroup road map is not being seen as language neutral technology.  If so, you are simply misrepresenting what the Roadmap is proposing;

 

RoadMap

New Chapter for book “Computational Semiotics”

 

Language dependencies will be revealed and certain adaptive and iterative properties will be demonstrated as we deploy the Global Information Framework. But at core, there is as much language neutrality as the natural world will allow.  

 

From page 10 of the Roadmap version 8.5

 

"Our technology delivers means for deriving language independent situation and global event analysis based on ontology representations.  The software systems integrate semantic extraction in English, Arabic and German.  Other languages are possible using the same techniques. 

General principles related to the differential ontology framework are laid out so that multiple languages are integrated into constructed elements of a single explicit ontology.  The integrated system will demonstrate features that are not available from any current semantic or knowledge management system.  "

 

I am also concerned that you have not picked up the language we have developed that delineates the principles of a "Second School" and distinguishes this school from the types of system design that is attempted by those following the W3C approach. 

 

If your Semantic Architecture for global measurement and analysis of all commercial transaction data is to be successful it must be designed with a full knowledge of why W3C type ontology development has not lead to startling successes.

 

 

We understand that that world has different types of people.  You are one of those whose vision can take large groups into unknown waters and create profound successes.

 

But your project needs scientific and technical advice and guidance. 

 

I came away from the meeting feeling that you simply have no place in your project for the work that I have done. 

 

Is this true?

 

There will be light on this. 

 

Roadmap