Saturday, March 19, 2005
Whose responsibility to create the best system possible
previous discussion on
“structural holonomy”. à
previous discussion on mapping
the Patent Space à
Parts I – III of the Adi structural ontology.
Co-current discussions in
Anticipatory Web bead thread à
I will combine some business we have in Philadelphia to coincide with the April 7th date, so I will join in meeting you and others at that time.
I am very intrigued by Andy’s presentation and would like to speak about some questions that I have.
I see a really grand and wonderful opportunity to prove indispensable to the architecture at the State Department and perhaps, a case for further funding in order to secure any opportunity that is deemed to exist.
I also saw the presentation Mills Davis put on or is about to put on, relating to the Ontology work done at NASA. I was particularly intrigued with his slide on "Lessons Learned".
On the subject of the event Structure Ontology Framework (e-SOF) for semantic extraction, just let me know if I left anything out of the specification.
event Structure Ontology Framework (e-SOF), how it was derived
event Structure Ontology Framework (e-SOF), how it will be used
We can create the necessary interface and API calls this weekend.
I am supposing you take the items we find and make them into triples or do whatever with them. For example, I am assuming Nathan would parse the results of iterative calls to the server to gather the data over ranges finding events, if necessary to gather the statistics on what is being discovered by the probes, and for failure analysis, where and why they turn up empty. [Note, please see the two figures I have inserted above. We need to see what the eight Readware e-SOF probes will creat.]
Cheers,
Ken