Communications on a National Project
Next-Wave Publishing, Part 3: Revolution in Context –
Seybold Publications Vol 3, Number 23
Posted for Scholarly Review Only
(also see comments by John Sowa)
There is a business model here. If venture capital were to focus on
funding a new manufacturing sector enabled by a Knowledge Sharing Foundation
concept, then this capital investment would serve to ignite a new economy.
Society moves because humans have facilitated access
to educational services.
Because of a real difference between natural systems and formal systems, we are concerned that the machine will act to restrict and control the free expression of humans. This control might act so as to eliminate possible challenge to the intellectual position that the system knows a truth that is not knowable by any human.
This is what is of great concern to many
Americans.
The situation is like that where a child has grabbed
a cookie in a cookie jar, but cannot get the cookie out of the jar because the
jar's opening is too small to bring the hand and the cookie out at the same
time.
In our opinion, the greatest possible social value
is in admitting that truth is not something that a computer can
"know".
In a Human-centric Information Production (HIP) system, interpretation results from
cognitive priming and cognitive acuity by humans. For example, the Ontology referential base (Orb) creates a
computer encoding of n-aries that are exactly about the actual patterns of
invariance that are occurring in social discourse. But the interpretation of what these patterns of invariance
mean within that social discourse is made by humans.